Zhivko Todorov
ALL CASE STUDIES

CASE 58 · GLIMMER · 2025

VMWAREEC2OUTPOSTSMGN

Off VMware, with an Outposts cushion for the workloads that needed it.

A broadcast media company had 60 VMs on VMware running everything from front-office IT to broadcast control systems. Most could move to EC2 outright; a handful needed sub-millisecond latency to studio hardware. We rehosted the bulk to EC2 and ran the broadcast-adjacent workloads on AWS Outposts in their facility.

INDUSTRY

Broadcast media

DOMAIN

MIGRATION

DELIVERED

2025

STACK

AWS MGN·EC2·AWS OUTPOSTS·DIRECT CONNECT·EBS·S3 GATEWAY·VMWARE (RETIRED)

RESULTS

What changed, by the numbers.

VMS MIGRATED

60

ZERO OUTAGES

BROADCAST LATENCY

< 0.8ms

OUTPOSTS LOCAL

VMWARE LICENCE SAVINGS

$182K/yr

NET OF OUTPOSTS COST

RUNTIME ENV. PARITY

100%

SAME OS, SAME RUNTIME

HOW IT WENT

The broadcast workloads were the constraint. They drove physical studio equipment over SDI and IP-over-fibre with hard timing requirements. Most cloud architects would have said "keep them on-prem." We said "put Outposts in the rack the VMware was in, and call it a day."

AWS Application Migration Service handled the front-office workloads — 51 of the 60 VMs. They moved to EC2 in five waves over eight weeks. The remaining nine workloads landed on Outposts running in the broadcast facility, keeping the sub-millisecond latency to studio equipment intact.

VMware was retired at the end of the migration. The annual VMware licence saving net of Outposts cost came in at $182k. The broadcast team noticed no functional change in their workflow. The runtime parity (same OS images, same runtime) meant zero rework on the applications themselves.

READY WHEN YOU ARE

Let's get your AWS bill (and architecture) in order.

The discovery call is free. You walk away with at least one concrete idea — even if we never work together.

Or email directly →